You are viewing this article in the AnnArbor.com archives. For the latest breaking news and updates in Ann Arbor and the surrounding area, see MLive.com/ann-arbor
Posted on Fri, Jul 6, 2012 : 2:59 p.m.

Ann Arbor educational foundation to revamp fundraising campaign after missing $300K goal for 2012

By Danielle Arndt

The Ann Arbor Public Schools Educational Foundation will be re-evaluating and revamping its initiatives for 2013, after coming in short of its overall $1 million fundraising goal.

The 2012 rendition of the foundation’s “One Million Reasons Campaign” wrapped up on June 30.

Executive Director Wendy Correll said, as of Friday, the foundation raised about $160,000. It had hoped to raise closer to $300,000 this year, Correll said, adding some donations will continue to roll in throughout the summer.

wendy correll.jpg

Wendy Correll

The foundation launched the One Million Reasons Campaign in January 2010 in response to the failed countywide schools millage in November’s general election. It became the group’s “big audacious goal” to raise $1 million in a year, Correll said.

“It was inspiring to donors to be able to say they could make a gift for what would have been their tax-levy contribution that year (had the millage passed). But the beauty of taxes is that they continue, and philanthropic gifts can’t necessarily.”

During the inaugural year of the campaign, the drive generated more than $335,000 to benefit programs and educational opportunities at the Ann Arbor Public Schools. That was the most the foundation has ever raised during an annual period, so the board of directors chose to extend the campaign to try to reach the initial $1 million target.

However, donations decreased the following year. The 2011 effort raised about $300,000, board members said.

Correll added while the foundation could have extended the campaign one more year and “been absolutely certain and confident” of reaching its original $1 million mark, it is time to move on.

“We are really proud of what we were able to yield,” she said. “Yes, we would have liked to have raised $1 million every year. The schools certainly could use it. But we’re still working to find that right combination of what the schools need and what our donors and the community want to support. … It’s all about finding the right product.”

Money collected via the One Million Reasons Campaign largely went to fund broad-scale programs outside of the core curriculum — programs that furthered excellence, enrichment and innovation; were exciting and inspiring; and led to both academic and talent development, Correll said.

“But now, so much has changed with education funding in the past three years, that now schools are looking for ways to maintain core programs that are in jeopardy of going away,” she said.

The AAPSEF will begin researching what other educational foundations across the state and country are doing to help schools. It also likely will survey its constituents — the district, current donors as well as non-donors — to see what types of fundraisers people would be likely to support, Correll said.

She said in California, educational foundations have started funding staff positions.

“It’s a lot of money, but is something that parents and communities feel strongly about,” she said. “Class sizes are getting bigger. Art teachers, music teacher have totally disappeared from some school districts. … So there are lots of balls up in the air.”

One item up for consideration for AAPSEF to fund with this year’s $160,000 is the afterschool busing for Ann Arbor’s four middle schools. The district’s Board of Education cut the 4 p.m. bus routes in an effort to balance the budget for 2012-13.

buzzing-a-hive-aapsef-grant.jpg

A group of Ann Arbor elementary students learn about the life cycle of bees first hand thanks to an Ann Arbor Public Schools Educational Foundation grant. This is an example of an enrichment program that the foundation has traditionally funded.

Courtesy of AAPSEF

It costs an estimated $84,284 to operate the afterschool busing.

The Ann Arbor PTO Thrift Shop Board of Directors already approved allotting up to $43,000 toward the service, said Ann Farnham, director of promotions and community relations for the shop. She said the PTO Thrift Shop gave the district a $100,000 grant to pay for enrichment-related busing as it saw fit, such as for field trips. The $43,000 will come from what is unused or left over from that gift, which is expected to be about $50,000, Farnham said.

The AAPS educational foundation’s board will meet at the end of the month to begin discussing how it will award grants for the 2012-13 school year. It's expected the afterschool busing proposal will be considered at this time, Correll said, adding the foundation received a $15,000 donation specifically earmarked for supporting the afterschool bus service at the middle schools.

Grant funding for the next academic year is directly correlated to the One Million Reasons Campaign funds.

The AAPSEF also has $1,000 Great Idea Grants for teachers that it gives out bi-annually and an endowment fund for long-term stability that it is trying to grow.

Correll said the financial climate has not been conducive to building endowment funds.

“We’ve found our donors are most interested in making contributions to fund programs in the immediate future, not something that might bear fruit 20 years from now,” she said. “We have to find that balance in our donor community. That is something we are going to be working on moving forward.”

For the 2010-11 fiscal year, the most recent year for which data is available, the AAPSEF tallied contributions of $426,088 in revenue and spent $371,333 on program services and $121,106 on administrative costs, according to the foundation’s IRS form 990. It had $1.18 million in total assets and $291,401 in liabilities.

Staff reporter Danielle Arndt covers K-12 education for AnnArbor.com. Follow her on Twitter @DanielleArndt or email her at daniellearndt@annarbor.com.

Comments

A Voice of Reason

Wed, Jul 11, 2012 : 7:37 p.m.

I am thinking it is time to FIRE Ms. Correll for failing to do her job. It is clear that in a community that already generously supports it public schools, asking for additional handouts for special programs does not seem necessary. Maybe the entire idea is flawed. When we pay $80K for a special election for a bond, it is clear that the public schools do not need money. Only fools are donated to the overhead burden, ineffective School Foundation funding arm. Close it down and save the donators the embarrassment of wasting their money on Ms. Correll's salary and not benefiting the kids. It would be great if AnnArbor.com could list the donors. I am guessing this money was already in the system and just put under Ms. Correll's umbrella. Ms. Correll, have some ethics and stop stealing money from the kids in the name of maintaining your job.

macjont

Sat, Jul 7, 2012 : 2:42 p.m.

The beauty of taxes? Open your eyes!

WLD1

Sat, Jul 7, 2012 : 5:18 a.m.

The biggest problem with public school systems are mismanagement. There vis no competition so they can waste all the money they want. primarily line their pockets and make the kids suffer. That is why we should have school vouchers. They would learn on how to become more efficient.

dotdash

Sat, Jul 7, 2012 : 11:52 a.m.

Michigan public schools actually spend a lower percent on administration costs than do charters -- surprise! http://www.mlive.com/education/index.ssf/2012/04/michigan_charter_schools_spend.html Here's the money quote: Michigan charter schools spent on average $1,141 less on instruction than traditional public schools. Charters spent about 47 percent of their operating budgets on instruction, compared to 60 percent for traditional public schools.

WLD1

Sat, Jul 7, 2012 : 5:14 a.m.

$121,106 on administrative costs, This should all be volunteer work. Another way someone came up with to make money.

MyOpinion

Fri, Jul 6, 2012 : 11:43 p.m.

The "One Million Reasons" campaign was really poorly advertised/run. I get around by bike and had to stop and practically go into a yard to see what the sign said (think larger font - much larger). Once I could see the sign it wasn't obvious what I was supposed to do. Seems like the foundation didn't get its money's worth out of its administrative overhead. These folks need to go back to running a PTO and raising $20,000 for school field trips or a playground.

dotdash

Fri, Jul 6, 2012 : 10:47 p.m.

For a district that bleeds public money to the county and the rest of the state, it's very odd that the EF is focused on tiny programs and teacher grants. Wouldn't it be better to aim at providing the kinds of funds that would allow the district to lower class size? I've lived in places where the educational foundations played a much larger role in saving schools from the vicissitudes of state funding. Those foundations were incredibly aggressive and very successful. Why is Ann Arbor's EF so passive? Is it a Midwestern thing?

dotdash

Sat, Jul 7, 2012 : 2:41 a.m.

I've seen other educational foundations commit to cover other budget items that they are not prevented from covering, thus leaving the district with more money to hire more teachers. In some districts, the EF hire teaching assistants who then "volunteer" in classrooms -- not sure that would fly here, but it used to be a pretty standard NYC practice. Where there is a will, there is a way. What concerns me is the lack of will here.

sh1

Sat, Jul 7, 2012 : 1:41 a.m.

The only way to lower class sizes is to hire more teachers, and though that's discussed in the article, it really doesn't seem plausible.

JRW

Fri, Jul 6, 2012 : 10:02 p.m.

Confusing article. I agree with @brimble. "Correll said the financial climate has not been conducive to building endowment funds." Uh, this has been going on since 2008, nothing new here. Maybe Correll should have used a better strategy to begin with.... "The foundation launched the One Million Reasons Campaign in January 2010 in response to the failed countywide schools millage in November's general election." Is this why the tech millage wasn't part of the November 2012 ballot? Better odds of passing in a spring election when few people vote, other than AAPS staff and parents?

J. A. Pieper

Fri, Jul 6, 2012 : 9:19 p.m.

So does this mean we can get rid of the "One Million Reasons Campaign" signs seen at various places? I am surprised someone could admit that "the financial climate might not be conductive to building endowment funds"! At this point in time, how could we even begin to worry about twenty years in the future when we are cutting millions from the AAPS school budget every year now, no wonder donors are looking for more immediate programs to support.

mr_annarbor

Fri, Jul 6, 2012 : 7:53 p.m.

@YpsiLivin You'd be missing an awful lot if no one paid any taxes.

YpsiLivin

Sat, Jul 7, 2012 : 12:18 a.m.

mr_annarbor, I understand the value in paying taxes. I'm just not sure I see any "beauty" in it.

YpsiLivin

Fri, Jul 6, 2012 : 7:40 p.m.

"But the beauty of taxes is that they continue ..." I've never seen the beauty in taxes. Am I missing something?

Erocypsi

Sat, Jul 7, 2012 : 5:17 p.m.

All you have to do to see the beauty of taxes, is to walk into a classroom, walk on your sidewalk, or talk to one of the men or women who hold a job in the public sector. Taxes aren't fun for sure, but I can see the beauty by taking pride in my little donation to society.

sh1

Sat, Jul 7, 2012 : 1:39 a.m.

I see the beauty of taxes every time I walk into a public library.

brimble

Fri, Jul 6, 2012 : 7:29 p.m.

As this story is written, the numbers seem a bit jumbled. The first line refers to a $1m goal, contradicting both the headline and the subsequent statement in the third paragraph. Is it correct that for the last fiscal year (July 1, 2011 - June 30, 2012), the goal was $300K, and the result $160K? And is that down from actual results of roughly $426K in the previous fiscal year? Might this have something to do with the fund management? In 10-11, it expended more than it took in, and 25% of expenditures went to administrative costs! (Assuming fundraising expenses are lumped in with administrative costs, that's still 2-3x the ratio of "good" charities.) Or is this a mis-read of the numbers?